Journal of Computer Technology & Applications Review Article
ChatGPT's Drawbacks and Benefits as a Study Aid for Students
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the opportunities and problems that come with using ChatGPT as a student assistance tool. A survey was completed by 60 students who had utilised ChatGPT for school-related reasons. The study examined the views of the students regarding the usefulness of ChatGPT, its impact on their learning, and any challenges they had when utilising it. Based on its prompt and accurate responses to students' inquiries, ChatGPT appears to have the potential to be a helpful supplementary tool for learners. The study also discovered that ChatGPT enhanced students' educational experiences by providing them with a multitude of information. The study highlighted several problems students faced with ChatGPT, including technical difficulties and a desire for more interpersonal communication. The study's conclusions expand on our understanding of ChatGPT's potential as a teaching aid and suggest future research directions. This study highlights the benefits of employing technology to support student learning while also discussing the potential challenges that may occur.
Keywords
References (13)
- WOGU Ikedinachi AP, Misra S, Assibong PA, Olu-Owolabi EF, Maskeliūnas R, Damasevicius R. Artificial Intelligence, Smart Classrooms and Online Education in the 21st Century: Implications for Human Development. J Cases Inf Technol. 2019; 21(3): 66–79. http://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT. 2019070105.
- Susnjak T, McIntosh TR. ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? Educ Sci. 2024 Jun 17; 14(6): 656.
- Floridi L, Chiriatti M. GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences. Minds and Machines. 2020;30(4):681-694. doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
- Johnson A. (2019 Feb 15). 5 ways AI is changing the Education Industry. [Online]. E-Learning Industry.
- Bayne S. Teacherbot: interventions in automated teaching. Teaching in Higher Education. 2015;20(4):455-467. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1020783
- Botrel L, Holz EM, Kübler A. Brain Painting V2: evaluation of P300-based brain-computer interface for creative expression by an end-user following the user-centered design. Brain-Comput Interfaces. 2015; 2(2–3): 135–149, doi:10.1080/2326263X.2015.110008.
- Singh N, Ahuja NJ, Kumar A. A Novel Architecture for Learner-Centric Curriculum Sequencing in Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring System. Natural Language Processing. 2020:722-742. doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-0951-7.ch035
- Beck J, Stern M, Haugsjaa E. Applications of AI in Education. XRDS: Crossroads. The ACM Magazine for Students. 1996 Sep 1; 3(1): 11–5.
- Hollands FM, Tirthali D. MOOCs: expectations and reality. Full report. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY. 2014. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED547237.pdf
- Popenici SAD, Kerr S. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. 2017;12(1). doi:10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
- Kay J. AI and Education: Grand Challenges. IEEE Intell Syst. 2012 Sep–Oct; 27(5): 66–69. doi:10.1109/MIS/2012/92
- Mukhamediev RI, Popova Y, Kuchin Y, Zaitseva E, Kalimoldayev A, Symagulov A, et al. Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies: Classification, Restrictions, Opportunities and Challenges. Mathematics. 2022;10(15):2552. doi:10.3390/math10152552
- Emerj. (2024). AI Sector Overviews Archive: Emerj Artificial Intelligence Research. [Online]. Emerj; 2024. Available from: https://emerj.com/ai-sector-overviews/